While i know what you mean, i've always found this to be a nonsensical argument. The IDE is itself an example of what can be done. It's unlikely that at my age I will outlive my Indy license that runs through 2025, but I hope that LiveCode does not perish first. Having been burned by the demise of Prograph, I do worry everyday about the possibility that LiveCode Ltd will fail and leave me abandoned as did Prograph. Yes, it's interpreted rather than compiled, but still I never cease to be amazed at its speed. My (so far) four freeware apps would not exist but for LiveCode. It was the HyperCard association that attracted me to LiveCode around 2015. It was wonderful, but once it got bought out and killed off I gave up developing apps for well over a decade, devoting myself instead to developing distance-learning courses for my university. Not having had a background in computer science, I might never have attempted to create a computer program otherwise.ĭuring the mid-1990s I adopted the ill-fated Prograph visual IDE for macOS. In defense of HyperCard, this was how I learned the basic principles of programming back around 1980. These days no-one uses the language in which they were such arrogant and ignorant experts. They dismissed it as a toy language with no future. ![]() I remember 20 years ago when I was tasked with learning Javascript for my team. Very hard to get arrogant and ignorant people to stop being arrogant and stop being ignorant. LC is vastly under-rated by the thousands of programmers because they think that something with a low barrier to learning must be very limited. Doing that in LC might not be something a novice would feel capable of tackling, but it's really not hard. One literally had to learn a new and obscure language just to make the IDE work a bit more to one's tastes. Trying to customize the IDE was really hard. I've used IDEs which had been around for the past 20 years. ![]() Perhaps this should be a point that is made clearer to those who don't know LC. The exception would be the C versions and Java. You can pretty much guarantee that with most of those "top 25 languages for mobile" their IDE/Repl is NOT built in the language itself. One of the things that makes LC stand out from the rest (and this has been true for 25 years, back to the Metacard days) is that the IDE is itself an example of what can be done. FWIW I've used 11 of the languages in that list of 25. Instead the advocates of Rust said "it's a meaningless request". The top result was to a Reddit discussion that provided not one example (not even a basic app). I just chose one of the languages from that list of 25 and Googled for sample applications. Of course all of this costs $$$$ which i suspect is the sticking point.īlazing examples of cool RL apps should be easy to find (and really not entry level stacks showing how 'easy' it is to code LC). I really think the mothership's website should include an extensive portfolio of all real apps created with LC, even it's it's just a paragraph - akin to, coupled with a social media onslaught (eg leveraging ads on social media so that when a customer searches for something like XOJO or even Flutter, they get a ton of adverts for LiveCode etc.) The reality is that it's probably more lack of awareness than anything else. I suspect there is a great deal of elitism when it comes to the people making these judgements, coupled with an ignorance of the platform (when your only tool is a hammer, every problem is a nail and so on). Having said that you can do many apps very well, and importantly much quicker that in many traditional environments. You can't really compete with the speed of a C++ or Swift app. I guess there are limitations with not being a compiled language - speed would be the main issue. Why has LiveCode not made a more reparable name for their self? Several of the names in the list of "Top 25 Programming Languages for Mobile Application Development" are a joke. Then when you add the UNBELIEVABLE support group of this forum, nothing else comes close. LiveCode is a truly AWESOME programming language. I could not have accomplished this feat without liveCode and this forum and God. Two of my apps have over 50,000 downloads (my apps are free) and approaching 100,000. ![]() There is NO OTHER APP LANGUAGE that can develop a quality app with such a small amount of programming. I am a novice programmer, but with LiveCode I was able to create some high quality app. I have been using LiveCode for more than 5 years and I have 9 mobile app published on both Apple and Android platforms. Top 25 Programming Languages for Mobile Application Development:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |